Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Characters of Polandball

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Characters of Polandball

Characters of Polandball (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm just bringing this here because... it's so freaking big I don't know if anyone is going to actually accept a PROD. Basically the most blatant violation of WP:NOTGALLERY I've seen yet. If it was in user space it would be a slam dunk WP:U5, but it ain't. TimothyJosephWood 19:48, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete I think this meets WP:A11. Power~enwiki (talk) 20:47, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Power~enwiki, it's not invented, not in the sense of A11. It's an "internet thing". See https://www.reddit.com/r/polandball/. TimothyJosephWood 21:26, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

This article is too stupid to argue about. One way or another, it will be gone soon. Power~enwiki (talk) 21:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

• Delete – nice to look at, but is completely unnecessary and fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:NOTGALLERY. @Power~enwiki, not sure this meets A11 as it actually is a thing. — Quasar G. 21:21, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
• Delete. Much as I'd love something like "I like it" to be a valid reason to keep something, comments above are completely correct. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:51, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
• Delete. Arbitrary internets cruft; no authority, hence WP:UNDUE. Staszek Lem (talk) 01:44, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
• Delete Needs more authoritive referencing - random internet thing? Deathlibrarian (talk) 03:09, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
• Delete, there are no sources. Sagecandor (talk) 16:32, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
• Delete as unreferenced and non-notable. --Lockley (talk) 19:08, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
• Delete: per other comments on this page. --Guy Macon (talk) 01:25, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
• Delete: it's meme-cruft GretLomborg (talk) 04:51, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
• Delete but transwiki to Commons. Unsourced WP:NOTGALLERY. But it is worth noting that it could be transwikified to Commons, where it could exist. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:20, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

• Delete as Wikipedia is WP:NOTGALLERY. Ajf773 (talk) 07:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
• Delete - as my nomination.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:10, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
• Note - As to transwiki...ing ... (insert words) this pretty much already exists at Commons:Polandball. Although it needs some cleaning up since it looks like it was done by script and the script went all wonky about half way through. TimothyJosephWood 12:12, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.